Search for: "State v. Parcel"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,932
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2008, 11:11 am
Ellis v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 10:49 am
In the case of Modern Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:24 pm
Talen Energy Marketing and CPV Maryland v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 8:54 am
In 1987, in connection with a proposal to subdivide a 950-acre parcel of real property then owned by the plaintiffs/petitioners Leonard and Habiague in the Town of Union Vale, the Town Planning Board issued a negative declaration pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 11:20 am
Bank v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 10:14 am
H.B. 2534 was enacted after the Nation announced its intention to build a casino on “Parcel 2” of the land, and after the Secretary of the Interior decided to take Parcel 2 into trust. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
United Parcel Service. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
United Parcel Service. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 9:40 pm
Following a reclassification by the Town of the permitted use of nine contiguous parcels from residential-agricultural use to industrial use, petitioners commenced a proceeding seeking to annul the local law based on, among other things, allegations that the procedures used to adopt the ordinance violated the State Environmental Quality Review Act. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Gatti v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:20 am
In Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, New York v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:54 pm
The United States Supreme Court will hear arguments tomorrow in the case Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 8:40 am
Eureka Building, Inc v City of Troy, 2020 WL 6887373 (ED MI 11/24/2020) [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:49 am
MCL 125/3603(2) states that the “concurring vote of a majority of the members of the zoning board of appeals is necessary . . . . [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:18 am
(EEOC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 11:11 am
Staker v Town of Springdale, 2020 WL 7779019 (UT App. 12/31/2020) [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:03 am
The statement of facts for the third party’s cargo stated that the bill of lading quantity was 6,014.906 MT. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:12 am
Cayuga Nation v Turner, 2021 WL 3160077 (2nd Cir. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 10:32 am
United Parcel Service. [read post]
