Search for: "State v. Parish"
Results 161 - 180
of 904
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm
United States, the justices turned down a request to decide whether to overrule the court’s 2005 decision in National Cable Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Bozeman v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Dux v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 11:03 am
Don Caldwell v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 7:47 am
(Normand v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 1:03 pm
Doe I v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:03 am
For example, in Orleans Parish School Board v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:51 am
One year later, the Eastern District granted motions to remand filed by Plaquemines Parish and the State of Louisiana in Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:51 am
One year later, the Eastern District granted motions to remand filed by Plaquemines Parish and the State of Louisiana in Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:51 am
One year later, the Eastern District granted motions to remand filed by Plaquemines Parish and the State of Louisiana in Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government, 893 So.2d 925 (La. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
In Rehfield v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:50 am
Ever since the June 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
A list of best practice models based on recommendations from stakeholders and the public and reviewed by subject matter experts; v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Additional Sources: Lee v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Soudelier, Jr. was aboard the towboat M/V Steven M. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
Elwood Breaux Jr. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:41 am
Louisiana October 7, 2019 – Today, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in Ramos v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 9:30 am
Having no idea of just how many South Carolina parishes had done so (because the evidence of individual parish consents -- such as may have existed -- was not in the record before the Supreme Court), the justices simply lifted a number out of ECUSA's brief to that court, and duly assumed that 29 parishes had "acceded" in writing to the Dennis Canon, and so were bound by the trust it imposed. [read post]
