Search for: "State v. Paton" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
  So, the court remanded the case for trial.The decision is Paton v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Monday 30 January  2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am by Legal Beagle
But it also states that when the action was raised, £8,000 of fees from one invoice were outstanding from one partner’s accounts. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 1:59 pm by Giles Peaker
It followed, he contended, that provided that the flat was being used as a private residence by someone, the circumstances of their occupation were immaterial. and that the only meaning that can be ascribed to the words ‘private residence’ is whether the flat can physically be described as a private residence, namely whether it retains the physical characteristics of a private residence such as a kitchen, bathroom and living area, and he cited in support of this proposition the… [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:22 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Paton, but a website created by a lawyer who criticized a collection company and sought clients to join the lawyer as a party and to hire him to represent them did not qualify as petitioning activity in Cadle v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:22 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Paton,but a website created by a lawyer who criticized a collection company and sought clients to join the lawyer as a party and to hire him to represent them did not qualify as petitioning activity inCadle v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:22 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Paton, but a website created by a lawyer who criticized a collection company and sought clients to join the lawyer as a party and to hire him to represent them did not qualify as petitioning activity in Cadle v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
Carter **Jennifer Lipinski is a law student at Michigan State University. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
Carter **Jennifer Lipinski is a law student at Michigan State University. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 1:19 pm by Giles Peaker
Mayflower Cambridge Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1975) 30 P & CR 28  was a planning case, concerning hotel use. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
: Normann Copenhagen ApS v Paton Calvert Housewares Limted (Class 99) Third-party observations: new OHIM practice statement (Marques) The next EPO President - the results are in from IPKat poll (IPKat) EPO presidency vote - the plot thickens as Swiss candidate claims to be in pole position (IAM) Inventive step focus in the EPO? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
: Normann Copenhagen ApS v Paton Calvert Housewares Limted (Class 99) Third-party observations: new OHIM practice statement (Marques) The next EPO President - the results are in from IPKat poll (IPKat) EPO presidency vote - the plot thickens as Swiss candidate claims to be in pole position (IAM) Inventive step focus in the EPO? [read post]