Search for: "State v. Patrick C." Results 41 - 60 of 632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2023, 3:52 pm by Josh Blackman
§ 1391(e)(1)(C) because the United States, one or more of its agencies, and one of its officers in his official capacity are Defendants, and Plaintiffs Joshua Roberts, Deborah Lawson, Laura Brunstetter, Julia Badger, Patrick Mendoza York, Patrick Wright, and Jana Spruce reside in this District, and no real property is involved. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:38 am by Keith E. Whittington
[Revised SB 18 has major problems] Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick has been set on killing tenure at Texas state universities ever since the University of Texas faculty senate had the temerity to object to his proposed ban on critical race theory. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am by John Ramming Chappell
  Upon passage of a simple resolution or receipt of a letter, the State Department must provide the requested report within 30 days. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On 15 March 2023, the ICO published its response to Sir Patrick Vallance’s Pro-Innovation Regulation of Technologies Review. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm by Gary Corn, Melanie Teplinsky
Entitled “Combating Ransomware: One Year On,” the paper was drafted in consultation with leading experts in the field: V. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm by bndmorris
Loewy’s article Cops, Cars, and Citizens: Fixing the Broken Balance was cited in the following article: Henry Patrick, South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 8:16 am by Michael Oykhman
The intent to mislead can be inferred from the evidence (see: R v Evans, 1995 CanLII 16088 (MBCA)). [read post]
In the amicus brief, we urged the Third District to join the other districts in the state and issue an opinion formally adopting the framework for awarding attorney fees set out by the Supreme Court in Hensley v. [read post]