Search for: "State v. Patrick P. Sharp"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2019, 7:51 am
The Press Release states: A federal jury today convicted Dr. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:11 pm
Icon Health & Fitness Inc. and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
” [via Illinois Supreme Court prepared summary] United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 4:58 pm
Associated Newspapers was granted permission appeal and the appeal was heard on 9 and 11 November 2021 with judgment being handed down on 2 December 2021, The Court, Sir Geoffrey Vos MR, Sharp P and Bean LJ, unanimously dismissed the appeal on all grounds, stating: “Essentially, whilst it might have been proportionate to disclose and publish a very small part of the Letter to rebut inaccuracies in the People Article, it was not necessary to deploy half the… [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm
(In a one-sentence, unsigned opinion, the court today also disposed of Murphy, ruling in favor of inmate Patrick Murphy “for the reasons stated in” McGirt.) [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 6:10 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
The UK Government has relaunched the campaign to overhaul the Human Rights Act 1998 in an attempt to counter what Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab has called “wokery and political correctness. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
The Application was refused, with Lord Summers relying on R v Legal Aid Board ex p. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 28060-20 Sturt v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27845-20 Garrity v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27809-20 Levick v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 15320-20 Cook v Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 12005-20 Oliver… [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm
Ohio, the Texas v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Sharpe, c1998 HF1425 .M37 1998 See Catalog Apathy LOSING TWICE: HARMS OF INDIFFERENCE IN THE SUPREME COURT / EMILY M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Sharpe, c1998 HF1425 .M37 1998 See Catalog Apathy LOSING TWICE: HARMS OF INDIFFERENCE IN THE SUPREME COURT / EMILY M. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:29 am
In DYSTAR TEXTILFARBEN GMBH v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am
In S.B.B. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am
Koziol, P. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
But with one exception, the case law on the admissibility of electronic records and electronic discovery ignores them; see: R. v. [read post]
