Search for: "State v. Patten"
Results 41 - 60
of 124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Court of Appeal decision In overturning the decision of first instance, Lord Justice Clark (with whom Lady Justice Gloster and Lord Justice Patten agreed) relied on the following reasons: In reviewing the case law regarding contractual interpretation (Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 and Gan Insurance Co Ltd v Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd [2001] CLC 1, 103 being particularly significant) it can be said that “the clearer the language the less appropriate it may be to… [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
On 27 January 2017, the Court of Appeal (Patten, King and Simon LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of His Highness Prince Moulay Hicham Ben Abdullah Al Alaoui of Morocco v Elaph Publishing Limited ([2017] EWCA Civ 29) , heard 30 November 2016. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm
Almost every newspaper, local and national has carried hysterical and inaccurate pieces setting out doomsday scenarios if section 40 is enacted and consistently misdescribing the Leveson system of audited self-regulation as “state backed” (or even “state”) regulation. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
His Highness Prince Moulay Hicham Ben Abdullah Al Alaoui of Morocco v Elaph Publish Limited, heard 30 November 2016 (Patten, King and Simon LJJ). [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm
United States Rolling Stone magazine has urged judges to overturn the libel verdict against them over fabricated story about University of Virginia rape. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
On 30 November 2016, the Court of Appeal (Patten, King and Simon LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of His Highness Prince Moulay Hicham Ben Abdullah Al Alaoui of Morocco v Elaph Publish Limited. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
United States Ryan Larson, the man c [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
Mr Justice Arnold is on a bit of a winning streak it seems, as last week in Idenix v Gilead [2016] EWCA 1089 the Court of Appeal consisting of Lord Justices Kitchin (giving the lead judgment), Floyd and Patten upheld his decision back in December 2014 (see Kat Darren's post here). [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:55 am
In considering the appeal, Lord Justice Patten examined many other apportionment methods that had been substantiated by ECJ case law: The “direct and immediate link” test (C-4/94 BLP Group v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1995] STC 424). [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
While this moggy was struggling to get back from Indonesia, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in the pregabalin appeal Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 1006 (13 October 2016), and finally the IPKat has managed to blog about it (the lateness by no means reflecting on the importance of the judgment).It is very much a judgment of three halves.In the first part of the judgment (up to [135]), which substantively disposes of the… [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 6:00 am
Excerpt: Introduction and sections II and V | Footnotes omitted. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:04 am
It contains an outline from Chancellor Ed Patten that hits the high points required of the petition, hearing, approval of the settlement and accountings. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
On Friday, Floyd LJ gave the leading judgment (with which Patten and Tomlinson LJJ agreed) in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 290. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 5:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:55 am
Meyne v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:44 am
Patten LJ (who gave the lead judgment) stated that where a company makes a claim for losses suffered by it as a result of the conduct of a fraudulent director, it does not matter if the company was the intended primary or secondary victim of the fraud. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:39 am
Patten v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:00 am
See, EEOC v. [read post]
