Search for: "State v. Patterson"
Results 181 - 200
of 879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2020, 9:01 am
Ratcliffe & Ratcliffe v Patterson & Porter. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:22 pm
The case is Patterson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 10:51 am
From yesterday's Ohio Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 11:25 am
Londro Patterson, No. 118,180 (Johnson)Direct appeal; First-degree felony murderPeter T. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:18 am
Patterson (McGirt v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:13 am
Patterson, 561 U. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:28 am
Recently, the Indiana Supreme Court decided that a business that loses customer traffic due to a State highway expansion project is not entitled to compensation.1 In State of Indiana v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
") AC32084 - State v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 5:02 am
Patterson, and Steven J. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 1:30 pm
Patterson. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:35 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:44 am
Impose reasonable regulations, as producing states have done. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:30 am
Patterson (holding that a petition challenging a new sentence after winning habeas relief is not a second or successive petition) and Porter v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:55 pm
These conclusions are reflected by the results in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
In Taylor Patterson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:09 am
Patterson, No. 09-158. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
Nye (Stagnaro, Saba & Patterson) has just filed our amicus brief in M.R. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:19 am
Likewise, the petitioners' hardship was self-created in that they completed the additions to the accessory building without obtaining a building permit (see Matter of Caspian Realty, Inc. v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Greenburgh, 68 AD3d 62, 77; Matter of Merlotto v Town of Patterson Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 43 AD3d 926, 930-931; Matter of Becvar v Scheyer, 250 AD2d 842, 843). [read post]
