Search for: "State v. Peace" Results 121 - 140 of 4,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2010, 3:21 am by Adam Wagner
Liberty along with Haw have tried to challenge those powers under human rights law, but, after victory in the High Court, ultimately failed to convince the Court of Appeal (see Haw, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 532 (08 May 2006).) [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Rosalind English
If it could be said that the Secretary of State in this context is the custodian of taxpayers’ money, and therefore preventing him from recovering overpaid benefits distributed as a result of mistake was an interference, somehow, with the peaceful enjoyment (ie custodianship) of this treasure chest, there might have been a role for Article Protocol 1 (the right to peaceful enjoyment of property) in this argument over statutory interpretation. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:21 am by 1 Crown Office Row
In finding the measures to be proportionate, the Court distinguished the case of Tabernacle v Secretary of State for Defence in which the Court quashed a byelaw preventing camping next to the Aldermaston nuclear site. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:35 pm
., Ocean Peace, Inc., and United States Seafoods, LLC, have each been fined by the EPA for violations of the Clean Water Act. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
Three weeks ago, CAAF granted review in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:07 am by CMS
ECHR Art 11 states that everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of their interests. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 10:43 am
All are longtime peace and disarmament activists. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 5:30 am by Gus Hurwitz
Steve Salop and Jennifer Sturiale have an interesting piece arguing, in light of West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:51 pm by Howard Friedman
Reporting on the oral arguments, the Washington Post said in part:Two appeals court judges clearly stated that there is no way to view the Peace Cross in Bladensburg other than as a symbol of Christianity.The third judge on the appeals panel just as strongly said that the marble-and-cement monument is a secular war memorial honoring the death and sacrifice of those lost in battle.Yesterday the 4th Circuit also heard oral arguments in EEOC v. [read post]