Search for: "State v. Pearce" Results 41 - 60 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Hetrick is not registered with any FINRA member firm, in compliance to Article V, Section 4, FINRA retains jurisdiction over him. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:40 am by Dr. Stuart Baran
Similarly, it was held (#2) that Pearce was not authority for justiciability of infringements of extra-EU copyrights. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:46 am by CMS
Earlier this year, two editors of the UKSC Blog, Jack Ballantyne and Louise Pearce, were invited to interview Lord Briggs at the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:07 pm by Justin Keith
” Applying the Supreme Court’s holding in New Process Steel, L.P. v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:13 pm by Rumpole
 Rumpole practice tip #19: Be aware of Wilson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Pearce & Adam Winer, From Emancipation to Assimilation: Is Secular Liberalism Still Good for Jewish Lawyers? [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:17 pm by Greg Robinson
In July 2010 Arizona state senator Russell Pearce proposed a new state statute to strip citizenship from the children of illegal aliens. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:23 am by Mack Sperling
The Fourth Circuit, in its unpublished opinion, lined up with the Seventh Circuit (United States v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:01 pm by James Eckert
Matter of Campbell v Pearce also held that once a defendant has started his sentence the court cannot vacate the plea because jeopardy had attached.Properly understood, I think this Court of Appeals decision that "County Court lacks the power to vacate the conviction or plea" removes the threat of state time from people who successfully challenge illegally severe local court sentences, and prevents vacating a plea induced by an illegally severe sentence, if… [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:07 am by INFORRM
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) was heard on 8 February 2012 and judgment was reserved. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:49 am
Pearce Corp., (1928 Minn.) 217 N.W. 374 (operator of roller coaster held to highest degree of care equivalent to that of a common carrier); Cooper v. [read post]