Search for: "State v. Pence"
Results 141 - 160
of 293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
Mike Pence lost any hope of ever winning national (and maybe even state) office with the first version of the Indiana RFRA. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 10:14 pm
Such a high stakes multi-state litigation effort would make the combative Bush v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
This is a journalistic account of a moot court of Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
The husband's shares plummeted in value from £2.99 each at the date of the settlement to just 27.5 pence each in March this year. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:20 am
Bedessem Revocable Trust Agreement UTA Dated November 25, 2008 v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
They were buoyed by Justice William Rehnquist’s 1985 dissent in Wallace v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:08 pm
Within hours, Vice President Mike Pence told Politico that the president is looking into legal avenues to “reconsider birthright citizenship,” arguing that “the Supreme Court of the United States has never ruled that the language of the Fourteenth Amendment … applies specifically to people who are in the country illegally. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
With 2,140 pages, each page works out at only 5.89 pence ... [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:14 pm
V(1). [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am
It is unclear when Pence is expected to testify. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 6:30 am
As Hasen recounts, “[t]he collapse of the Pence-Kobach fraud commission and the Fish v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 4:03 am
From Tucson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
In Trump v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 7:27 pm
But we are absolutely kidding ourselves if we think that such a victory would in fact enable the passage (and signing by either Trump or Pence) of progressive legislation. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
James School v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:09 am
” Yesterday the justices heard argument in Knick v. [read post]
