Search for: "State v. Pendelton"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2012, 1:25 pm
Pendelton King Et Al. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:51 am
While most of the underlying causes of action were time-barred before the plaintiff retained the [*2]defendants, the plaintiff's claim under 42 USC § 1983 arising from malicious prosecution was viable at the time the defendants commenced the federal action on the plaintiff's behalf (see Palmer v State of New York, 57 AD3d 364, 364; Pendelton v City of New York, 44 AD3d 733, 737). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
While most of the underlying causes of action were time-barred before the plaintiff retained the [*2]defendants, the plaintiff's claim under 42 USC § 1983 arising from malicious prosecution was viable at the time the defendants commenced the federal action on the plaintiff's behalf (see Palmer v State of New York, 57 AD3d 364, 364; Pendelton v City of New York, 44 AD3d 733, 737). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:43 am
Aviators and others say Bell V-280 Valor is safer and long overdue as a replacement. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Family Voices Coordinators have met with their state legislators and with state ICC Council members many times this yea, and have sent Family Voices information to over 10,000 families in the state. [read post]
