Search for: "State v. Penn-Kennedy"
Results 1 - 20
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2010, 8:19 am
(h/t Steven Burbank, Penn Law). [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:50 am
The question before the United States Supreme Court was whether, in a regulatory taking case, the “parcel as a whole” concept as described in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 2:56 am
Wisconsin: landowner subjected to forced multi-parcel grouping loses regulatory takings case 5-3, Kennedy writing [opinion, Cato brief, Roger Pilon (Penn Central takings case was a train wreck, and SCOTUS should stop trying to build on it) and more, Ilya Somin (multi-factorial test proffered by Kennedy “a recipe for confusion, uncertainty, and constant litigation”), Gideon Kanner, Robert H. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:32 am
But for the wrongly decided Kennedy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 8:21 pm
Murr v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:02 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
3 May 2008, 9:01 pm
Karass (07-610), and Kennedy v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Stephen Bruce has posted a new version with "more history" of his article on the compulsory arbitration decision, Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:46 pm
(Immigration law scholars made this argument in an amicus brief in which I served as co-counsel with Shoba Wadhia of Penn State and WilmerHale’s Alan Schoenfeld, Ben Gifford, and Francisco Unger.) [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:55 am
In Vartelas v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:36 am
United States on Monday, April 18, despite the case being “orphaned” by the U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:12 pm
Oral argument in Horne v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:39 pm
I teach employment law for Penn State's School of Labor and Employment Relations. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:28 am
In 1978, Brennan wrote for a 6-3 majority in the Penn Central v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:26 pm
Supreme Court decided (5-4) 14 Penn Plaza v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm
Both Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy, concurring in the judgment, offered critics of the ban a bit of a silver lining: The justices sought to nudge the president toward more civil rhetoric and overruled Korematsu v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:40 pm
The Murr family are the plaintiffs in Murr v. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 4:57 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
The second case Kennedy talked about was Elmore v. [read post]
