Search for: "State v. Perales"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2011, 8:09 pm
Supreme Court (LULAC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 8:15 am
Armijo v. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 10:53 am
Nina Perales is vice president of litigation for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and counsel in La Union del Pueblo Entero v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 6:01 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
** Marentette v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
** Marentette v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
(When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Perales 75 B. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:37 am
In State of Texas v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division's ruling states:"The article 78 court correctly determined, upon consideration of all the facts, that respondents' denial of petitioner's application for reinstatement to his former position with NYCHA was not arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Roberts v Gavin, 96 AD3d 669, 671 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:46 pm
” In Perales v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 9:51 am
459/98 Martínez del Peral Cagigal v Commission [2001] ECR I? [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Evenwel v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:10 pm
So what did the state do? [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Perales, 39 S.W.3d 149, 172 (Tenn. [read post]
11 May 2013, 4:00 am
Perales, 81 NY2d 182, 185 (1993), citing Matter of Prue v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
Perales, 77 N.Y.2d 126, 564 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 566 N.E.2d 134). [read post]
