Search for: "State v. Petersen"
Results 101 - 113
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:07 am
However, in another German case before the ECJ, Petersen v Berufungsausschuss fuer Zahnaertze fuer den Bezirk Westfalen-Lippe it was not justifiable for a maximum age of 68 to be imposed on doctors and dentists practising in the state medical system where it was alleged that the rule was necessary to protect patients from a decline in performance as doctors and dentists got older: no such age limit existed in the private sector. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:41 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0154, 2009 MT 412N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 2:12 pm
Petersen v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Law Lessons from STATE V. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
Petersen, 85 N.J. 638, 645 (1981) (reiterating the desirability of “[v]oluntary accommodations regarding matrimonial differences”); Ozolins v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 1:50 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued its opinion in the case of Kentucky Waterways Alliance v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 3:08 am
Here is a Second Department Case: Petersen v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, P.C. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
Box 7788 Santa Rosa, CA 95407-0788 Phone: (707) 566-8647 Fax: (707) 586-3279 E-mail: ucpnb@sonic.net UCP of the Golden Gate 1970 Broadway, Suite 600 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: (510) 832-7430 Fax: (510) 839-1329 E-mail: info@ucpgg.org Web: http://www.ucpgg.org UCP of Stanislaus County 1213 13th Street Modesto, CA 95354 Phone: (209) 577-2122 Fax: (209) 577-2392 E-mail: rlonczak@yahoo.com CALIFORNIA STATE RESOURCES AGING The California Association of Area Agencies on Aging (C4A) 980 Ninth… [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 12:58 pm
More details coming For publication opinions today (5): In Jill Petersen v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:37 am
The prisoner had complained that officials only permitted him to practice his Wiccan religion in his residence dormitory, and not outside it, out of concern about reaction from Christian prisoners.In Petersen v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 6:00 am
Petersen, 264 Neb. 790, 652 N.W.2d 91 (2002){Supreme court dismisses case because Counsel for Discipline botched it} State ex rel. [read post]
