Search for: "State v. Phillips"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,870
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
A short aside from Dennis Crouch In Phillips v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:02 am
Prigg v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:05 pm
Bernhardt (ANCSA)Phillips v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:17 am
The Second Circuit has held that it is within the State's police power to require children to be vaccinated in order to attend public school and that such a requirement does not violate the First Amendment or other constitutional rights.Citing Supreme Court precedent, the Second Circuit held that the right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community or the child to communicable disease or the latter to illhealth or death.The Second Circuit further held… [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:03 am
Although Jack Phillips, the baker in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:47 pm
Phillip J. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 6:49 pm
In Phillip v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
Take for example, the case in Phillips v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 8:09 am
In McCulloch v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:24 pm
Indeed, in its last public trust/State title case, Phillips Petroleum v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:41 am
It is not often that a court allows reargument, states that it misapplied the law, and reverses itself as took place in Orlando v Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck, P.C. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 1:31 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 8:09 am
This week, the UK Supreme Court refused permission to appeal in the matter of Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union v Wightman and others. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
In the view of Lord Phillips, the Court of Appeal had erred in equating knowledge with subjective belief. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
In the view of Lord Phillips, the Court of Appeal had erred in equating knowledge with subjective belief. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 3:36 pm
Cir. 2013) (first citing Phillips v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 6:13 am
One commissioner suggested that [baker] Phillips can believe “what he wants to believe,” but cannot act on his religious beliefs “if he decides to do business in the state. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:25 pm
Authored By: Phillip M. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:33 pm
Perhaps Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
