Search for: "State v. Phillips" Results 641 - 660 of 2,870
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2012, 12:31 pm by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; David L. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”  The Petitioner in this appeal to the Commissioner sought the removal of the board member for displaying the Association's postcard and his "FYI" statement, contending that the member had "violated board policy and the prohibition on electoral advocacy described in Matter of Phillips v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”  The Petitioner in this appeal to the Commissioner sought the removal of the board member for displaying the Association's postcard and his "FYI" statement, contending that the member had "violated board policy and the prohibition on electoral advocacy described in Matter of Phillips v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Phillips, 12-544 and its prisoner-on-top counterpart Phillips v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Reinstatement following termination pursuant to §73 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Hoover v County of Broome, 2009 NY Slip Op 51101(U), Decided on June 2, 2009, Supreme Court, Broome County, Judge Phillip R. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:13 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
And when lists go on—as a Maine dairy company recently learned the hard way in O’Connor v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Federalist Society blog, James Phillips explains why the pending cert petition in Kerpen v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:00 am by Grace Capel
Lord Phillips relied on the following evidence of state practice which, in his view, pointed toward an agreement that a prosecutor can be an issuing judicial authority: (i) a number of Member States designated prosecutors as issuing judicial authorities; and (ii) this had not been the subject of criticism by other Member States, the Commission or the Council [67-76]. [read post]
21 Sep 2024, 8:55 am by Tom Smith
Raimondo and its companion case, Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]