Search for: "State v. Pico" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2023, 4:33 pm by Tabatha Abu El-Haj
This editorial by Steven Hill (Democracy SOS) reflects on the implications of the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in Pico Neighborhood Association v City of Santa Monica–the the first California Voting Rights Act case to reach the state’s Supreme… Continue reading The post “A new and better California Voting Rights Act” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:30 am by Eugene Volokh
But three other federal appellate courts have disagreed, and have recognized—I think correctly—that Pico didn't resolve the issue; e.g., Griswold v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:03 am by Scott Bomboy
The school board appealed to the Supreme Court, which took Pico and a companion case, Bicknell v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 6:30 pm
This represents a most interesting development of Western Hemispher and developing state Leninism, the transposibility of which remains uintested. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But three other federal appellate courts have disagreed, and have recognized—I think correctly—that Pico didn't resolve the issue; e.g., Griswold v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
This change would improve G’s “influence” as Pico would define the term. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 2:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
To turn to speech hostile to a group I belong to (Jews), when I talked about a rare recent group libel case, the Montana State v. [read post]