Search for: "State v. Pilkington"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 12:27 pm
May 1, 2023) and SEC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 6:07 am
The leading case on the effect of successive and mutually inconsistent planning permissions granted for development on the same site is Pilkington v Secretary of State for the Environment [1973] 1 WLR 1527. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:12 am
HPL argued that it was an abuse of process for Snowdonia to make arguments based on Pilkington v Secretary of State for the Environment [1973] 1 WLR 1527 (which relates to the incompatibility of planning permissions) when that case had been decided in 1973 and yet had not been raised by Snowdonia’s predecessor in title in the High Court proceedings in the 1980s. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am
In Pilkington v Pilkington, 185 A.D.3d 844, 127 N.Y.S.3d 523, 2020 N.Y. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:58 am
The United Kingdom Court of Appeal in Pilkington v CGU [2004] held that the risk of future damage doesn’t mean that glass panes installed in the glass roof of the Eurostar terminal at Waterloo station were actually damaged (although they were prone to fracture). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 10:33 am
”) Pilkington N. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:38 am
In Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 4:46 am
” In The Guardian, Ed Pilkington discusses Buck, stating that the case calls on the court to decide “whether it is acceptable in the United States in 2016 to put a prisoner to death because he is black. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:48 am
Morgan Tire and Pilkington & Lee v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 5:31 am
., United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 5:13 pm
The first challenge to a photo ID law to reach the Supreme Court—Crawford v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
” While the case of Fiona Pilkington vividly illustrated what can go wrong when victims are not heard, to my mind there is not enough concern with weighing the evidence and not necessarily taking evidence of victims (perhaps a more neutral term would be “complainants”) at face value. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:58 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:27 am
Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm
Another group of courts found that the exclusion was ambiguous or required to be interpreted based on history of the exclusion and looked at the presentations of the insurance industry to the various insurance commissioners in the various states “Doer v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:32 am
Jackler and Bowie v. [read post]
