Search for: "State v. Pisciotta"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2021, 2:59 pm
The Supreme Court stated in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 1:22 pm
One case (Pisciotta v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:09 pm
Pisciotta (1982) 30 Cal. 3d 800, 807). [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 3:45 am
In dismissing the suit, the court cited the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Pisciotta v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
In the primary Seventh Circuit case decided before Clapper involving standing in the data breach context, Pisciotta v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 2:39 pm
Starbucks Corp., 628 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir. 2010) (threat of future identity theft sufficient to confer standing) and Pisciotta v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:52 pm
Id. at 4-5 (citing Pisciotta v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:11 am
Some courts, like the Seventh Circuit in Pisciotta v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 10:47 am
Starbucks, and Pisciotta v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:07 pm
” In support of its conclusion, the Third Circuit cited cases that were dismissed because the alleged future harm was deemed “neither imminent nor certainly impending,” distinguishing decisions in Pisciotta v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:58 am
(Pisciotta v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:20 pm
Pisciotta, Ross C. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 6:38 am
” Moreover, while the court did not find the Seventh Circuit’s reasoning in Pisciotta v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:06 am
Bockler v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 4:01 am
” Amburgy v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 8:01 pm
” Amburgy v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:26 pm
Indeed, as Judge Buckles observed in his opinion, subsequent to the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Pisciotta v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 8:57 pm
In addition, relying on Pisciotta v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:34 am
See, e.g., Pisciotta v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 8:58 am
" (citing Pisciotta v. [read post]
