Search for: "State v. Plain"
Results 41 - 60
of 12,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2016, 6:44 am
Lyle Denniston on SCOTUSBlog boils down the issues before the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
United States, the D.C. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 pm
In Robey v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:26 am
Under United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 11:55 pm
In felon in possession of a firearm trial, trial court committed plain error by reading unredacted indictment which disclosed that the defendant had previously been convicted of armed robbery as defendant had offered to stipulate to his felony status, in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 6:37 am
Jones appeals, asking this Court to review for plain error his unpreserved claim that the prosecutor made improper remarks during closing argument. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:03 am
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Mischaracterized testimony A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for St. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:50 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
The post State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 10:41 am
The First Circuit handed down a notable little sentencing opinion dealing with plain error yesterday in US v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:08 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 11:30 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 3:03 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:23 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 12:39 pm
See, http://www.cancer.org.au/content/pdf/CancerControlPolicy/PositionStatements/TCUCCVBkgrndResrchPlainPak270511ReEnd_FINAL_May27.pdf [3]http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report_australia-strips-glamour-off-cigarette-enforces-plain-packaging-law_1772119 [4]The Australian Constitution allows the Parliament to acquire property only “on just terms from any State or person for any purpose in respect of which the Parliament has power to make laws”. [5]JT International SA… [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 8:36 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:42 pm
General Rule The Supreme Court held in Hormel v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
Thus, the iPhone and iPod touch were also properly seized under the plain-view doctrine.U.S. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:25 am
When the state of the law is fuzzy, then these abstract rights get you nowhere in court. [read post]
