Search for: "State v. Pohl"
Results 21 - 40
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
James Pohl, the presiding judge in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 12:35 pm
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:37 pm
Tune in to explore: A host of Supreme Court developments, including action relating to DACA, immigration detention and the due process clause, Patchak and the question whether Congress can direct courts to dismiss a class of cases, and especially the United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:00 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:30 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Citing U.S. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
First, as it relates to voluntariness: Ruiz marshals United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am
Last week at the Guantanamo military commissions, proceedings resumed in the case of alleged USS Cole bomber Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:29 pm
Flynn argues that, while the defense invokes Waller v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
Judge Pohl made note of Mr. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:51 am
And under United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm
This prevents Bormann from discussing the records with her client, which goes against “one of the most fundamental aspects” of Skipper v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am
Judge Pohl takes this as a convenient time for a recess. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am
Ben reviewed the two big questions at issue in Washington v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am
Conceding that no cases were directly on point, Connell cites United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm
Under Crawford v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:22 am
Judge Pohl calls the session to order. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:30 am
He cites Florida v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 11:50 am
” Rushforth argues that the motion “presents the court with a question that is simply stated but which has profound consequences: Is this proceeding governed by the Constitution of the United States of America? [read post]
