Search for: "State v. Poland" Results 21 - 40 of 653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am by Robert Loeb, Cesar Lopez-Morales
On Oct. 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the first one, United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:49 am by sally
High Court (Family Division) R v R [2012] EWHC 2390 (Fam) (13 August 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Glowacki v Regional Court in Ostroleka Poland [2012] EWHC 2305 (Admin) (25 July 2012) Jones v Government of United States [2012] EWHC 2332 (Admin) (25 July 2012) Media Protection Services Ltd v Crawford & Anor [2012] EWHC 2373 (Admin) (16 August 2012) Krolik & Ors v Several Judicial Authorities of Poland [2012]… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 1:36 am by INFORRM
Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated “this draft legislation threatens media freedom and could undermine Poland’s strong investment climate”. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:32 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner sought a total of $36,795.61 in costs actually incurred by or on behalf of petitioner to locate J.R. in the United States and to file and prosecute his petition for the return of J.R. to Poland. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:10 am by Tom Smith
Under this state-by-state patchwork, the United States may develop an abortion regime that starts to look more like Europe’s. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:10 am by Tom Smith
Under this state-by-state patchwork, the United States may develop an abortion regime that starts to look more like Europe’s. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am by Rohini Kurup
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 11:20 am by Allard Knook
It also held that the Commission, by its decision addressed to Poland, had failed to comply with the duty to state reasons and, in relation to Estonia, the principle of sound administration. [read post]
Also of interest in this case is the court’s reference to Lord Sumption’s judgment in Zakrzewski v District Court in Torun, Poland [2013] UKSC 2, which stated that “as a general rule the court of the executing state is bound to take the statements and information in the warrant at face value. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:57 am by Donald Clarke
Poland, that effectively bars states under its jurisdiction from extraditing anyone to China. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 1:26 pm
The Commission tried to do something to reduce those emissions but in Case T-183/07 Poland v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:28 am by Joel R. Brandes
[Poland] [Well-Settled] [Grave Risk of Harm] Charalambous v Charalambous, --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 4963063 (1st Cir. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 8:13 am by raoneeri
Madison is the Most Important Case decided by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:37 am by sally
Vicoplus SC PUH v v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid; BAM Vermeer Contracting sp. zoo v Same; Olbek Industrial Services sp. zoo v Same (Case C-307/09 to C-309/09); [2011] WLR (D) 46 “Articles 56FEU and 57FEU of the FEU Treaty did not preclude a member state from making the hiring out on its territory of workers who were Polish nationals subject to the obtaining of a work permit during the transitional period provided for in paragraph 2… [read post]