Search for: "State v. Poland" Results 101 - 120 of 707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2016, 2:20 am by Lucy Cass, Olswang LLP
When Poland joined the EU in 2004 the provisions of the Treaty on Accession 2003 (“Accession Treaty“) enabled existing Member States, such as the UK, to exclude Polish nationals (along with nationals from seven other acceding Member States, so-called “A8 Nationals“) from the right to residence unless they had achieved registered employment in that State for an “uninterrupted period of 12 months” following accession. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:59 pm by Amy Howe
Black sites and state secrets In United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 11:57 am by Sara Bjerg Moller
Back in 2014, Poland did so following Russia’s invasion of Crimea. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 1:48 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down an great judgment in Case C-346/06 Dirk Rüffert v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 5:06 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
On December 19th, 2012, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its judgment in case C-325/11 Alder v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 2:32 pm by Giorgio Luceri
Background and analysis of the Judgment are provided by Comparative Patent Remedies.In the United States, there is a new development in the Epic Games v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The Case of the Day is Agudas Chasidei Chabad of the United States v. [read post]
Last week, the Republic of Finland also filed an intervention, joining Poland, Denmark, Italy, France, Romania, Sweden, the United States of America, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Germany, Lithuania and Latvia. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:39 am by sally
(on the application of) v Leeds City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 640 (26 May 2011) Omega SA v Omega Engineering Incorporated [2011] EWCA Civ 645 (27 May 2011) Cala Homes (South) Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 639 (27 May 2011) Ridgeland Properties Ltd v Bristol City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 649 (27 May 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Group Lotus Plc & Anor… [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
This requires the restriction to respond to a “pressing social need”, for relevant and sufficient reasons; and to be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued by the State. viii) As with all Convention rights that are not absolute, the State has a margin of appreciation in how protects the right of freedom of expression and how it restricts that right. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:53 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Beham, The German-Polish Cultural Property Debate – Can Pragmatic Solutions Overcome a Convoluted Controversy Jan Barcz, The Polish-German Border in the Light of the 2+4 Treaty and the Polish-German Treaty on the Confirmation of the Border between Them Władysław Czapliński, State Boundaries and Third States – Issue of Opposability. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:01 am by Eleonora Rosati
Three years after its adoption, the discussion of and around the Directive on copyright and related rights in the Digital SingleMarket 2019/790 (‘DSM Directive’) is anything but exhausted.The fate of one its key provisions – Article 17 – is still unknown due to the pending judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) in Poland v Council and Parliament, C-401/19. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:15 pm by Cyberleagle
This includes the so-called snippet tax (the press publishers’ right) and the Article 17 rules for online sharing service providers (OSSPs).A CJEU challenge to Article 17 by the Polish government (Poland v Parliament and Council, Case C-401/19) is pending. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts: Tysiac v Poland: Analysis Contraception, capacity and coercion: when does a woman lack capacity to decide whether to use contraceptive treatment? [read post]