Search for: "State v. Pollara"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Stay pending reexam denied because a stay would result in ‘more significant’ prejudice given the Court’s overall speed in disposing patent cases: Telecommunication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 1:37 am
That release cites a 2006 Pollara survey as the basis for the statement. [read post]
