Search for: "State v. Ponds"
Results 81 - 100
of 435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
District Judge Jeffrey V. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am
Its aim was to add technical specificity to Justice Kennedy’s “significant nexus” test set forth in Rapanos v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:14 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Palazzolo v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:34 pm
If it does impact a navigable water in that manner, then it falls under federal jurisdiction A key issue at the trial of Joseph David Anderson was whether the ponds Mr. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
In Radiance Capital Receivables Fourteen, LLC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:41 am
The Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals tackled that somewhat messy issue with its recent decision and order in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 10:13 pm
Just this week on January 18th, the Supreme Court of the State of Washington in Davis v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 10:13 pm
Just this week on January 18th, the Supreme Court of the State of Washington in Davis v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:25 am
In South Pacific Co. v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 12:48 pm
Coalition v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
The agencies claim that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:56 pm
Wheeler, et al., and South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:56 pm
Wheeler, et al., and South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, et al. v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:13 am
In Miracle-Pond, et al. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 1:58 pm
” In Whitman v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court, Sackett v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:30 am
What qualifies as "property" and the right to exclude: While the consent of individual officials representing the United States cannot "estop" the United States, see Montana v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Snyder v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 1:34 pm
Now, animals are hardly rational according to most meanings of the term "rational," but they do tend to satisfy preference consistency, and hence their strategic interactions can be cogently modeled as rational action---even if the creatures are pond scum or dung beetles. [read post]
