Search for: "State v. Ponds"
Results 141 - 160
of 435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2017, 6:38 am
Grace v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
William Bookout v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:56 am
Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, No. 07-0783 (DDB), becomes (on rehearing) the most divided case of this term: read down for more about this one; Whether it is a taking for the State to repurpose the dirt it removes for a pond to use in a highway project (it is): State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:36 am
In Cornell v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:53 am
See Price, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 8:49 am
Co. v E.E. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:35 am
Snyder v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
Reversed.In State of Indiana v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
See earlier post on Lucinda Vine and Kristy Pond v PLS Financial Services, Inc. and PLS Loan Store of Texas, Inc., No. 16-50847 (5th Cir. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 3:04 pm
Rockwell International Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:17 pm
Supreme Court issued its decision in Kaiser Aetna v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:21 pm
Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 7:09 am
We can only hope that this will be the result of U.S. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Chief Justice Strine dissented, excoriating Duke for its "business strategy … to run the company in a manner that purposely skirted, and in many ways consciously violated, important environmental laws" (City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 5:21 pm
United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979), which involved Oahu's Kuapa Pond, and issues of uncompensated public access. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:05 am
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Order in Druery v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:27 am
Waters, appellant
NEW YORK STATE COURT OF CLAIMSEvidenceState Is Denied Use of CPLR §4547 to Block Evidence of Settlement Negotiations, Agreement Arben Corp. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 2:03 pm
The Court went on to describe how to allocate the burden of proof between covered and non-covered claims in the case entitled: State of California v. [read post]
