Search for: "State v. Prosser"
Results 61 - 80
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2013, 10:38 am
” (Prosser, Law of Torts (3d ed. 1964) p. 353.) [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:33 pm
Supreme Court explained in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
In State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:49 am
The case is Hubbard v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 3:00 am
See also, Henningsen v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 3:08 am
Thus, punitive damages may be awarded where the [*6]wrong complained of is "actuated by evil and reprehensible motives" (Walker, 10 NY2d at 404), is "intentional and deliberate, and has the character of outrage frequently associated with crime" (Prozeralik v Capital Cities Communications, 82 NY2d 466, 479 [1993], quoting Prosser and Keeton, Torts § 2, at 9 [5th ed 1984] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:49 pm
In Kelly v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
Prosser’s Strict Liability to the Consumer, 18 Hastings L.J. 9 (1966). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
The Scottish Legal Aid Board Criminal Legal Assistance Handbook, Part III ABWOR - Summary Criminal Proceedings, paragraph 3.19, states that the case disposal fee is currently £515 with add-ons payable in some cases bringing these payments into line with the financial limit of £550. [7] Miss Law informed me that in this case the solicitor was entitled to £485 but because there were three adjourned diets the total maximum fee was £535. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
The Scottish Legal Aid Board Criminal Legal Assistance Handbook, Part III ABWOR - Summary Criminal Proceedings, paragraph 3.19, states that the case disposal fee is currently £515 with add-ons payable in some cases bringing these payments into line with the financial limit of £550. [7] Miss Law informed me that in this case the solicitor was entitled to £485 but because there were three adjourned diets the total maximum fee was £535. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:48 am
As the Supreme Court of Canada rightly stated in Hill v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
., State Constitutions and the Protection of Individual Rights, 90 Harv. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:07 am
Fraley, et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
” (Eastburn v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:54 am
Prosser & Keeton §? [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm
Donohoo v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
See William Prosser, Law of Torts, 4th ed. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:47 pm
Glynn Lunney: He heard an argument for reduced damages for unauthorized users who create value, but that doesn’t implicate blocking copyrights as in Gracen v. [read post]
