Search for: "State v. Prouse" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm by James Romoser
United States that Sheehan had a First Amendment right to continue publishing the classified material. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 2:06 pm by Phil Dixon
Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979), the court stated: “Absent articulable suspicion that Feliciana lacked the required permit, Officer Alto was not entitled to stop Feliciana’s vehicle at his discretion to check whether Feliciana possessed a permit. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm by Jon Sands
Prouse, 440 US 648 (1979); US v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:49 am by Markus Sermons
The likely reason that the supervising officer let the driver go about his business is that the United States Supreme Court in the case of Delaware v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:49 am by Markus Sermons
The likely reason that the supervising officer let the driver go about his business is that the United States Supreme Court in the case of Delaware v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
To conclude that officers in the field must follow a plan which is set in place by the higher echelons, and then to conclude that the officers in the field may cavalierly disregard certain key elements of that plan, whether intentionally or unintentionally, would be to countenance the "standardless and unconstrained discretion" and "evil" the Supreme Court spoke about in the case of Delaware v Prouse,, 440 US 648, 661 [1979]. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Second, the United States Supreme Court has "insisted that the discretion of the official in the field be circumscribed as held in Delaware v Prouse. [read post]