Search for: "State v. Purcell"
Results 41 - 60
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2021, 10:41 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 3:32 pm
On the timing issue, it cited the Supreme Court decision in Purcell v. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 2:56 am
See Navarro v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am
Every state has a process for verifying the identity of the voter who casts an absentee ballot. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:32 am
”) But as one of us explains today in a Justia column (and as Justice Ginsburg’s majority opinion in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
First, the injunction violated the Purcell principle by altering state election laws close to an election. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:39 am
While dozens of cases are still pending and new cases are being filed every week, the Purcell v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:24 pm
" His opinion in Democratic National Committee v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:24 pm
" His opinion in Democratic National Committee v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:34 pm
In Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:51 pm
Both cases, Moore v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:41 pm
In the case of Harley v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:42 am
” At the Daily Wire, Denise Harle comments on FDA v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Ever since Bush v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:04 pm
That would set the stage for targeted post-election litigation over ballot-counting procedures – essentially a reprise of Bush v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:10 am
The principle takes its name from Purcell v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:11 am
The first argument, in Jones v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:38 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:14 am
“In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 845; see Bells v Foster, 83 AD3d 876, 877). [read post]
