Search for: "State v. Quill Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
Florida Department of Revenue 16-567 Issue: Whether a state can collect sales tax on out-of-state property ordered over the internet for out-of-state delivery, by relying on this court’s decision in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
From Tax Update Blog: State taxing authorities have long despised the Supreme Court's ruling in Quill v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:46 am
From the days of Geoffrey through 2011, the states were largely victorious in corporate income tax nexus cases involving "foreign" holding companies. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm by Amanda Traphagan
Department of Revenue of Illinois and Quill Corporation v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 7:19 am by Kevin Kaufman
Pennsylvania has historically interpreted the Quill Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:55 pm
The Iowa Department of Revenue and Finance, affirming the imposition of Iowa’s corporate income tax on KFC, despite lacking a physical presence in the state. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:55 pm
The Iowa Department of Revenue and Finance, affirming the imposition of Iowa’s corporate income tax on KFC, despite lacking a physical presence in the state. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 12:14 pm
Revenue (1967) and Quill v.Heitkamp(1992), the Supreme Court had held that states could not impose sales and use taxes on corporations unless there was a physical presence in that state. [read post]
Ct. 2080 (2018), overruling the physical presence for commerce clause nexus upheld in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:09 pm by Adam Thimmesch
The Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision overruling its long-standing physical presence rule in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am by David Post
Early in the Internet Era (1992), the Supreme Court held, in Quill v. [read post]