Search for: "State v. Quilling"
Results 201 - 220
of 264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Otherwise, the Supreme Court wrote in its 1992 case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:39 am
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:01 am
” Three years later, in Back to the Internet Taxation Future, reacting to a reappearance of the proposal to permit state 1 to require retailers in state 2 with no state 1 connection to be taxed by state 1, I explained why progress had not been made, pointing out the inability of legislators and others to distinguish between sales and use taxes, the silliness of claims that internet retailers are not required to collect sales taxes at all for any… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
All of the franchisor’s franchisees in Iowa were independent businesses that licensed their use of the franchisor’s trademark and related system.The franchisor protested the assessment of the income tax, arguing that, in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:16 pm
Quill Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:09 pm
Quill Corp. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
Otherwise, the Court held in its 1992 case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Foremost among these advantages is the ability to exploit Quill Corporation v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:13 am
" United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:10 pm
The case law is Quill Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:37 pm
Dep’t of Revenue of the State of WashingtonDocket: 10-1289Issue(s): (1) Whether this Court's holding in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
THAT’S FUNNY, I THOUGHT TENNESSEE HAD ELECTED A REPUBLICAN GOVERNOR: Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam Wil…
7 Jul 2011, 2:29 pm
It’s clearly within Congress’s proper role and — as the Supreme Court held in Quill v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:19 pm
Earlier this year Michigan v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:47 am
A quill-type stem is a stem that is inserted into the steerer. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:17 pm
This agreement simplifies state tax systems, removes burdens to interstate commerce that are defined in the United States Supreme Court decision in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Quill Corp v North Dakota that states cannot collect sales tax from businesses unless that business had a physical presence within the state. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 11:58 am
The best answer, then, would be for the Supreme Court to revisit its conclusion in the 1992 case Quill Corporation v North Dakota, which required a physical presence in order for states to mandate collection of their sales taxes by companies that make sales to their residents. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
In a report we released last year, we outlined why the reasoning underlying these laws is constitutionally suspect: In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:48 am
It is notable that this injunction, like the KFC v. [read post]
