Search for: "State v. R. A. R."
Results 61 - 80
of 79,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2009, 2:33 am
R (Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (4) [2009] EWHC 152 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 36 “A novel issue, the striking of a balance between the public interest in national security and the public interest in open justice, the rule of law and democratic accountability, lay at the heart of the [...] [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:35 am
R (Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] EWHC 2048 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 2 “The principles set out by the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Comrs [1974] AC 133 could be applied in novel circumstances to require the Foreign Secretary to disclose information, specific [...] [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The court further held that the trial judge had not been wrong to dismiss the appellant’s submission on non-prosecution assurances and had correctly applied the test in R v Abu Hamza [2007] QB 659. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 8:35 am
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Defendant’s failure to testify Appellant Devante R. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:01 am
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) (No 2) v Secretary Of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWHC 97 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 39 “A stated intention by the Government to abolish regional strategies and to promote legislation for that purpose was capable in law of constituting, for the purposes of section 70(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, a ‘material consideration’ to which planning authorities could have taken regard in making… [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:41 am
R (Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (3) [2008] EWHC 2519 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 323 “In the light of the stance taken by the US government that it would reconsider the intelligence relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom if the court were to make the order sought by the claimant, the appropriate course was to stay proceedings until after the outcome of the forthcoming hearing in the US… [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:54 am
R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [2008] UKHL 63; [2008] WLR (D) 00; [2008] WLR (D) 328 “The policy of disentitling persons without accommodation from receiving the disability premium to which they would otherwise be entitled in their income support amounted to discrimination within art 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms but it was lawful as… [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:54 pm
R. was accused of embezzling $10,000.00 from her former employer. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:24 am
R (G) v Governors of X School (Secretary of State for Children and Schools and Families intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 1; [2010] WLR (D) 4 “Where an individual was subject to two or more sets of proceedings, or phases of a single proceeding, and a civil right or obligation enjoyed or owed by him would be determined in one of them, he could (but not necessarily would), by force of art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, enjoy… [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 12:15 am
On Friday, a two-judge panel of the High Court of Justice decided R (Saadoon & Mufdhi) v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
R (Daley-Murdock) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 161; [2011] WLR (D) 56 “It was contrary to the policy and objects of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 to impose an obligation on the Secretary of State when refusing an overstayer’s application for leave to remain to make an appealable removal decision at the same time which would confer a right of appeal. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 1:59 am
No duty of care owed over child support R (Rowley and others) v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 11:01 am
Comm’r of Social Sec., April 15, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit More Blog Entries: Allensworth v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:45 am
On 23 November 2015 the Supreme Court heard a two day appeal of the decision in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 1608. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:41 am
The joint session of the Supreme Court and Privy Council heard the appeals in R v Jogee and Ruddock v The Queen (Jamaica) between the 27 and 29 October 2015. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:12 am
R (Al-Sweady and others) v Secretary of State for Defence (No 2) [2009] EWHC 2387 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 292 “In any judicial review proceedings relating to a case which involved crucial, ‘hard-edged’ questions of fact in light of which it was necessary for the court to allow cross-examination of makers of witness statements on those [...] [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:45 am
Coate, FTC discuss UNITED STATES V. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:53 am
R (Friends of the Earth and another) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change [2009] EWCA Civ 810; [2009] WLR (D) 276 “On an application for judicial review of the Secretary of State's alleged failure to take steps to implement targets specified in the Warm Homes and Energy Conservation Act 2000 and the UK [...] [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:41 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0582, 2012 MT 199, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
