Search for: "State v. R. Hope"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Firstly, the authorities are unclear on what percentage of the population has to be at risk before a country is removed from the white list (in R (Husan) v SSHD [2005] EWHC 189 Admin 1% of the population was considered ‘significant’, yet in Singh v SSHD & Anor [2001] EWHC 925 (Admin), 0.76% of the population was not). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
Karkkainen v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 3:00 pm
Under the hypothetical facts of McCain v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
” 3 Wayne R. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
R (Quila & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (Bibi & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:28 am
"Earlier posts on City of Hope v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
United States, and United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
This book aims to correct misconceptions about R v Ryan and Doucet herself. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am
Starting on Monday 13 February 2012 is the two day appeal of R (on the application of ST (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department in front of a panel of seven (L Hale, L Hope, L Brown, L Mance, L Kerr, L Clarke and L Dyson). [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:47 am
In Bacchus Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
In a very rare outcome, in the case of R (Davis and ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin) the Divisional Court declared that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) is inconsistent with European Union law and therefore is “disapplied”, although the Court suspended the effect of its order until after 31 March 2016. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:03 am
In yet another case arising from Operation Durango (a government-run sting that lured hopeful immigrants into "bribing" brokers), the court had sympathy for the applicant who fell for the sting operation, but the court faulted the lawyer's inadequate development of legal theories to challenge the sting and referred the matter to the state bar. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:49 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
In R. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 2:45 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Nouri & Anor, R v [2012] EWCA Crim 1379 (27 June 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) R & Ors (Minors), R (on the application of) v The Child and Family Court Advisory and Support Service [2012] EWCA Civ 853 (29 June 2012) Loader, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Goverment & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 869 (29 June 2012) High Court (Chancery… [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
In R. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Morris, 2018 ONSC 5186 “Mr. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:50 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41 (28 January 2011) Hope and Glory Public House Ltd, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 31 (26 January 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Shah v General Pharmaceutical Council [2011] EWHC 73 (Admin) (28 January 2011) Jones v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC 50 (Admin) (27 January 2011) Oadby Hilltop and… [read post]
