Search for: "State v. Ramming" Results 161 - 180 of 522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2015, 8:15 am
             Part VIII of the MCC was inserted following the judgment in Subramaniam Balaji v State of Tamil Nadu. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 6:36 am by Joy Waltemath
The opt-in plaintiffs in Lagos were from 15 different sales offices, operating under 28 regional sales managers and 12 sales directors, the court stated, noting that the issue before the Lagos court was whether RAMs and GAMs from across the country were similarly situated. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:36 am by Shubhangi Agarwalla
This exposition in itself is unremarkable since the Supreme Court in Sant Ram v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 11:16 pm
With a 2.13GHz Intel Core Duo processor and a 128 GB solid state hard drive, the price jumps to $1,799 ($1,699 for students). [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
I wondered that myself.In AFFIRMING Suffolk Supreme's dismissal of plaintiff's complaint for invasion of privacy against Allstate (with costs), the Second Department held:New York State does not recognize the common-law tort of invasion of privacy except to the extent it comes within Civil Rights Law § § 50 and 51 (see Ram v Moritt, 205 AD2d 516, 517; see also Cohen v Herbal Concepts, 63 NY2d 379). [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:32 am by SHG
The image was of some Mad Max villain driving his auto of death toward a crowd of children at ramming speed. [read post]