Search for: "State v. Ramzy"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 6:04 am
Today your correspondent will observe, via CCTV, pre-trial proceedings in the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 2:00 am
Tomorrow morning, in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Circuit Court’s en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:57 am
At 0900, the fun resumes at Fort Meade’s Smallwood Hall, where (as always) your correspondent will view, via CCTV, pre-trial proceedings in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:15 am
Hearings at Guantanamo Bay on United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:43 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 6:19 pm
And that’s as good a reminder as any that, tomorrow, Lawfare will resume coverage of pretrial motions hearings in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:44 am
It is here that we take in the sorta-live broadcast of pretrial proceedings in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm
United States may hint at a reprise of the al-Kidd pattern. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:50 am
Brigadier General Mark Martins’s statement regarding this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:56 pm
The reader might miss Siems’s subtle acknowledgement later on (which he does not quite state directly) that Robertson’s opinion was vacated by the D.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:55 am
United States, which is currently pending appeal. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am
The standard for removal and subsequent trial in absentia in both federal and U.S. military courts is Illinois v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 10:46 am
And all of a sudden Ramzi Binalshibh is standing up. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
DoD Press Release, here, announces: The Department of Defense announced today that the convening authority, Office of Military Commissions, referred charges to a military commission in the case of “United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am
Russell KNAGGS and Ramzy KHACHIK v the United Kingdom – 46559/06 [2011] ECHR 1328 (30 August 2011) European Court of Human Rights: refusal to admit intercept evidence in court proceedings not breach of human rights. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:09 am
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:48 pm
This has elicited the usual philosophical responses, none more eloquent than our own Supreme Court in AG v O’Brien, that such policies ‘involve the State in moral defilement’. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 5:31 pm
I disagree with Robert Chesney and Benjamin Wittes’ comments on the Salahi v. [read post]
