Search for: "State v. Randolph" Results 101 - 120 of 777
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by ernst
Despite lots of its own inconsistency, the Supreme Court adopted this view in 1866 in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am by Anne Joseph O'Connell
In a memorandum from Mitnick to Nielsen, Mitnick wrote: “Pursuant to your authority set forth in section 113 of title 6, United States Code, you have expressed your desire to designate certain officers of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in order of succession to serve as Acting Secretary. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:38 am by Derek Fincham
In our current digitally connected age it is easier than ever now to document and share the proliferation of art meant to protest, encourage, and criticize the current state of institutional racism in the United States and elsewhere. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:22 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Search of person A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County convicted appellant, Tyrell Randolph, of illegal possession of a firearm with a felony conviction, illegal possession of a firearm, and illegal possession of ammunition. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm by Ben Berwick, Rachel Homer
” Instead, the Framers drafted a Constitution that required the Senate’s “Advice and Consent” for the appointment of “Officers of the United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Allan Blutstein
In a concurring opinion, Judge Randolph stated that FOIA’s 2007 amendment did not restore the “catalyst theory” because the amended provision “requires only correlation not causation. [read post]