Search for: "State v. Red Star" Results 1 - 20 of 274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2022, 11:30 pm by Bickerton Law
Does the Supreme Court’s decision in the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:29 pm by Howard Knopf
  It’s interesting to contrast the UK Red Bus decision with the recent  controversial US 2nd Circuit decision in Cariou v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
Because we provide abortion care, the state of Arizona subjects Desert Star — and our patients — to a slew of harmful regulations. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:23 pm by ipandentertainmentlaw
The Red Hot Chili Peppers filed suit against Showtime’s Californication, claiming the show – which stars and is co-produced by David Duchovny – stole from the band’s 1999 album by the same name. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
Also, it's about Red Buses, a popular preoccupation of both the IPKat's weblog and of his friends on the 1709 Blog and Art & Artifice. [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:47 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Underwood, who hails from the Sooner State, said about her donation: I have watched the devastation in my home state of Oklahoma over the past several days with great sadness. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 2:20 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
There's a feature story in today's Honolulu Star-Advertiser, "Red tape ties up groups' fishpond restorations," about a local caretaker group's frustration with "government rules" they claim are thwarting their efforts to fix up a traditional littoral fishpond. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:26 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question that the Italian Supreme Court had to address in Ralph v Mediaset and Others, decision 14635/2018 [Katpat to Valentina Borgese for the heads up and the text of the decision]. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 10:20 am
 So let's take a look at Case T-450/11 Galileo International Technology LLC v OHIM, the European Commission and the European Space Agency (ESA). [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
   It distinguished the case of Vajnai v Hungary – where the conviction for wearing the “totalitarian symbol” of a red star was a violation (see the discussion on the ECHR Blog here) because there was no evidence of a risk of disorder in that case [29]. [read post]