Search for: "State v. Reddy"
Results 1 - 20
of 217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2024, 4:07 am
In Reddy v Siemens Telecommunications (Pty) Ltd 2007 (2) SA 486 (SCA) the employee, as per his restraint of trade clause was prohibited from joining the employer’s direct competitors in the market. [read post]
The Implications of An ICJ Finding that Israel is Committing the Crime Against Humanity of Apartheid
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
Reddy, played a pivotal role in coordinating efforts to end apartheid in South Africa. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:17 am
Law professors Joshua Davis and Anupama Reddy suggest algorithms might provide DOJ clearer trails to litigate such collusive schemes. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 1:40 am
In Reddy v Siemens Telecommunications (Pty) Ltd 2007 (2) SA 486 (SCA) the employee, as per his restraint of trade clause was prohibited from joining the employer’s direct competitors in the market. [read post]
Don’t Judge a Range by its Cover: Federal Circuit Sides with Patentee on Written Description Support
11 Feb 2024, 9:43 am
Reddy’s Labs. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
The HKEX stated that issuers’ boards that are only composed by members of one gender will be in contravention of its Listing Rules. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:08 pm
Murali Krishna Reddy,[4] and further elucidated in Impresario Entertainment v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
It did not review a challenge to changes to agricultural laws that sparked nation-wide protests for months, and is only now hearing a challenge to the alteration of the federal status of one Indian state that was enacted in 2019. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Similarly, in Karnail Singh and others v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:43 am
This was the case in R v Rogers [2014] EWCA Crim 1680, where there was no act of money laundering in England but it was sufficient that the underlying fraud generating the criminal property took place in England and there were English victims. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:30 am
Cheffins and Bobby V. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:30 am
Cheffins and Bobby V. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 1:08 pm
Alabama and Food Employees v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:12 am
Manohar Reddy and Another v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm
In State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
Defendants Osborne Reed & Burke, LLP, Bressler & Kunze, Burke Albright Harter & Reddy, LLP and Moyer Russi & Randall, PC (hereinafter collectively referred to as the law firms) respectively moved pre-answer to dismiss the complaint against them as time-barred and for failure to state a cause of action (see CPLR 3211 [a] [5], [7]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:20 pm
Ridpath A, Reddy V, Layton M, et al. [read post]
