Search for: "State v. Reddy"
Results 121 - 140
of 216
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2007, 5:55 pm
" In Tellabs v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:09 pm
This article was written by Verushka Reddy, a Director at Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm
In State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:06 am
Reddy's and Teva (as extensively covered by Patently-O) interprets AIA prior art provisions to overrule the venerable Metalizing Engineering Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:29 pm
(see also Rachamreddi Chenna Reddy v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
India TV9 Telugu has been criticised for its coverage of women’s issues specifically that of senior police officer Sunitha Reddy’s divorce by academic Padmaja Shaw. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
In 1974, the Supreme Court held in Geduldig v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:30 am
Cheffins and Bobby V. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:30 am
Cheffins and Bobby V. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Katfriend Nicoletta Epaminonda takes a loot at the Cypriot transposition of the Trade Mark Directive 2015/2436 and reflects on what the future might hold for trade marks in this Member State. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:33 am
: AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) US: WFU law professor says Federal Circuit failed as “keeper of the Constitution” in AMP v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:20 pm
Radhakrishnan J. has gone considerably further, and has clearly stated that: (i) the judgment of Ranganath Misra J. constitutes the ratio of McDowell; and (ii) Reddy J. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:39 am
Murali Krishna Reddy,[20] the plaintiff is part of the hospitality business and has since 1994, used the word mark, “Banyan Tree” which has now acquired a secondary meaning. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:31 pm
Reddy’s Labs. [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:00 am
(Property intangible) US: Supreme Court rules 9-0 that CAFC has jurisdiction to review case remanded by district court to state court: Carlsbad Technology Inc v HIF Bio, Inc et al (Managing Intellectual Property) (Patently-O) US: Anticipation by a laundry list of prophetic DNA sequences: In re Gleave (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) US: Reverse payment settlements and biotechnology (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) US: Biogen seeks review and correction of patent term adjustment… [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
The Bench relied on the principles laid down in several decisions and reiterated the following observations in Kasturi Lal Lakshmi Reddy v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
Reddy, No. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
Reddy's Laboratories v Eli Lilly [2009] EWCA Civ 1362 where the judge, having reviewed the EPO jurisprudence on obviousness including Agrevo T 0939/92 stated: "The EPO jurisprudence is founded firmly around a fundamental question: has a patentee made a novel non-obvious technical advance and provided sufficient justification for it to be credible? [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Three decades ago in Palmer v. [read post]
