Search for: "State v. Regan"
Results 101 - 120
of 256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm
” These include the dismantling of terror cells in Portland, Oregon, and Lackawanna, New York, as well as the conviction of several Al Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Taiba affiliates operating in the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 8:10 pm
In R v Regan, the Court described this role as an important check and balance, going so far as to call Crown counsel a “minister of justice” in all stages of their work. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 4:53 am
XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYThe Court answers the question certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:17 pm
Ct. 2518, 2531 (2014); see also Regan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:13 am
” See Regan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 7:13 am
Regan and in Regan v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:58 am
Regan was a curious case about judicial review under FIFRA. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Supreme Court found that switching the Members from the 62/5 plan to the 57/5 plan violated Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Supreme Court found that switching the Members from the 62/5 plan to the 57/5 plan violated Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Mitt Regan of Georgetown, Prof. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm
The constitutional analysis in the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Matal v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:51 pm
The case was Pettway v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:51 pm
The case was Pettway v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Regan, 584 F. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 10:35 am
Regan, 584 F. [read post]
