Search for: "State v. Reichman"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Trying to nullify state capture. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
A successful online retail business known as BedBathStore is at the center of a bitter father-son dispute over its ownership in a case decided earlier this month by a Brooklyn appellate court in Reichman v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:46 pm
That entire issue is an article written by Reichman and Professor Ruth Okediji of the University of Minnesota Law school called “When Copyright Law and Science Collide: Empowering Digitally Integrated Research Methods in a Global State. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously reversed a New York State Supreme Court's ruling granting the City of New York's motion to [1] dismiss racial discrimination claims alleged by Plaintiffs pursuant to the New York State and City Human Rights Laws and [2] the hostile work environment claim Plaintiffs alleged pursuant to the New York City Human Rights Law which the Plaintiffs had asserted against the City of New York and a named defendant.Citing Harrington v City… [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously reversed a New York State Supreme Court's ruling granting the City of New York's motion to [1] dismiss racial discrimination claims alleged by Plaintiffs pursuant to the New York State and City Human Rights Laws and [2] the hostile work environment claim Plaintiffs alleged pursuant to the New York City Human Rights Law which the Plaintiffs had asserted against the City of New York and a named defendant.Citing Harrington v City… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Ctr., 203 AD3d 708; Reichman v City of New York, 179 AD3d at 1117; see also Bilitch v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Ctr., 203 AD3d 708; Reichman v City of New York, 179 AD3d at 1117; see also Bilitch v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Ctr., 203 AD3d 708; Reichman v City of New York, 179 AD3d at 1117; see also Bilitch v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Ctr., 203 AD3d 708; Reichman v City of New York, 179 AD3d at 1117; see also Bilitch v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
4 May 2021, 5:46 am
Ct. at 2717 (quoting Babbitt v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:46 am
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved.Goldman v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 7:17 am
Colleen V. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 11:54 pm
Supreme Court decision in NAACP v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:12 am
De Matos (Brunel University London)The Shadows of Modern State Law: a Visual Genealogy of Dark KnightsSophie Doherty (Dublin City University)What does Justice in the Aftermath of Sexual Violence look like? [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:19 am
Here’s what the court wrote: Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that the LLC’s records, which included the LLC’s tax returns for the years 1999 and 2000, established that Winston Chiu’s initial membership interest was 25% (see Reichman v Reichman, 88 AD3d 680, 682; Man Choi Chiu v Chiu, 38 AD3d 619, 621; Matter Capizola v Vantage Intl., 2 AD3d 843, 844). [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Dinwoodie: state of law or practice? [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:31 am
Alkhafaji v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Ted Cruz Finds Friendly High Court Audience in Campaign Finance Challenge Courthouse News Service – Kelsey Reichman | Published: 1/19/2022 Members of the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:34 am
There is also a case (Reichman & Dunn v Beveridge & Gauntlett from 2006), admittedly involving a commercial tenancy but at the moment it applies to residential tenancies, which says that if a tenant wants to leave early, a landlord has no duty to ‘mitigate’ his losses and will be entitled to continue to demand the rent from the tenant – even if they are no longer living there – on a month by month basis. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:34 am
There is also a case (Reichman & Dunn v Beveridge & Gauntlett from 2006), admittedly involving a commercial tenancy but at the moment it applies to residential tenancies, which says that if a tenant wants to leave early, a landlord has no duty to ‘mitigate’ his losses and will be entitled to continue to demand the rent from the tenant – even if they are no longer living there – on a month by month basis. [read post]
