Search for: "State v. Resendiz-Merlos"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
Resendiz-Merlos, ___ N.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]