Search for: "State v. Rice" Results 441 - 460 of 999
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm by streetartandlaw
” Concrete Machinery, 843 F.2d at 606 (1st Cir. 1988); Rice v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
People v Castellano, 41 AD3d 184, 185; People v Carter, 40 AD3d 1310, 1312). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:40 pm by Lyle Denniston
In the Philippine extradition case, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had ordered his return for prosecution, but a federal District judge ruled that a transfer would violate his rights under the anti-torture treaty, and ordered him released. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Rice, involving a Chinese American child assigned to a “colored school” in Mississippi, in which the Court reaffirmed that school segregation would be left to the states. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm by Priscilla Smith
S 2000bb(b) (1).[3] Smith, 494 U.S. at 887 (equating evaluation of centrality with, inter alia, substantiality) (citing United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:52 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image via WikipediaBy a 4-2 margin, the Colorado Supreme Court this week held in Denver Post Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On Tuesday 31 January 2023 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Nagi v Sinniah Santhiramoulsan. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm by Mack Sperling
Rice, Attorney-Client Privilege in the United States, §9:22, at 82 (2013-2014 ed. 2013). [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 04772-19 Ward v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 04771-19 Ward v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03688-19 Ward v Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation Last Week in the Courts On 27 October 2020 there was a trial of a preliminary issue in the case of… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
United States Reuters reports the US District Court for the District of Montana blocked a ban on TikTok that was set to take effect in Montana 1 Jan. 2024. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:13 am
Federal Act unless that [is] the clear and manifest purpose of Congress.' " (quoting Rice v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am by John Day
 Each count of the indictment must be a complete indictment, he argued, citing Rice v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:07 pm by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
In my 2014 blog post “Freedom of Speech and Family Law,” I discussed Appellate Division decision issues in the case of State of New Jersey v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:58 pm
"The Court added that the fact that the litigation is mainly fought in India in respect of a temporary injunction is a very unsatisfactory state of affairs. [read post]