Search for: "State v. Ripa" Results 1 - 20 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
Surveillance In response to a 2015 Press Gazette investigation into police use of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) to secretly view journalists’ call records and identify lawful confidential sources, the UK Government has admitted that its pre-2016 surveillance regime violated human rights laws. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, to the extent the plaintiff seeks an award of treble damages in the context of the legal malpractice cause of action, it fails to state a cause of action pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Pszeniczny v Horn, 193 AD3d 1091; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840). [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:58 am by Cyberleagle
That, in the form of Judicial Commissioner approval of the Secretary of State’s decision to issue a warrant, is now a feature of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 which has superseded RIPA. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
In the European Court of Human Rights, Big Brother Watch and various other NGOs challenged the pre-IP Act bulk interception regime under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA). [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:09 am by Cyberleagle
CopyrightDigital Single Market EU Member States are due to implement the Digital Copyright Directive by 7 June 2021. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
As regards the second question, the Court re-stated the scope of s. 94 orders thus (paras 51-52): That data includes traffic data and location data, as well as information relating to the services used, pursuant to section 21(4) and (6) of the RIPA. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Petersongs v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) pending from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v… [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:15 pm by Cyberleagle
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Petersongs v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) pending from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz(Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v Telenet (Belgium).Questions about injunctions against intermediaries are also raised in… [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am by CMS
In Lord Carnwath’s view, the provision in s.67(8) RIPA for a route of appeal to the Secretary of State did not add anything, given that that power had not been exercised and was ultimately an executive power, so did not support the argument that the courts should not have ultimate control [104]. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm by INFORRM
In Lord Carnwath’s view, the provision in s.67(8) RIPA for a route of appeal to the Secretary of State did not add anything, given that that power had not been exercised and was ultimately an executive power, so did not support the argument that the courts should not have ultimate control [104]. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
 By a 4:3 majority the Court allowed the appeal, holding that s.67(8) of RIPA did not oust the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am by familoo
RIPA divides covert surveillance into 'directed' or 'intrusive' surveillance. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Online state surveillance: The UK’s Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (IP Act), has come almost completely into force, including amendments following the Watson/Tele2 decision of the CJEU. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 3:25 pm by Graham Smith
Issues under consideration include whether the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights can be relied upon to justify exceptions or limitations beyond those in the Copyright Directive (Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, C-516/17;  Funke Medien (Case C-469/17) (Advocate General Opinion 25 October 2018 here) and PelhamCase 476/17); and whether a link to a PDF amounts to publication for the purposes of the quotation exception (Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, C-516/17). [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:05 am by JULIE BALL, TRAINEE, MATRIX CHAMBERS
Lord Justice Sales also noted that at the relevant time there was no right of appeal from the IPT under RIPA 2000 but made provision for the Secretary of State by order to provide otherwise. [11]. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
  That should become clearer after the outcome of Liberty’s appeal to the Court of Appeal in its judicial review of the Act and various pending references to the CJEU.Meanwhile the recent Strasbourg judgment in Big Brother Watch v UK (yet to be made final, pending possible referral to the Grand Chamber) has exposed a separate set of flaws in the IP Act’s predecessor legislation, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Section 1 of RIPA prohibits the unlawful interception of communication in the course of transmission unless authorized by a Section 5 warrant, which must be approved by the secretary of state. [read post]