Search for: "State v. Rivers"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2011, 2:01 pm
In Linda Aldridge v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:15 pm
When the original 13 states became sovereign, they gained absolute right to all navigable rivers and the lands beneath them for public use. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 3:24 pm
City of Eagle River v Slusarczyk, 2015 WL 4079137 (WI App. 7/7/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Preemption, Signs Tagged: traffic signs [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Instead of the state map let's use a city or a county map. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:31 pm
In New Jersey v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:55 am
The oral argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:04 am
Here is the decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
On June 20, 2012, Cody Tuma was sentenced in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana after having pled guilty to one misdemeanor count of discharges to the Red River in violation of the CWA. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 5:30 am
” Intel Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:58 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:07 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has decided the case of North Carolina v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:13 am
Here is the opinion in San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 8:42 pm
Utah State Engineer. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:25 am
It is an "original jurisdiction" case, states suing each other over river water: Kansas v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:59 pm
("NLG") and Digital River, Inc. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:24 pm
In 2009, however, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ordered remediation of river sediments upstream from the site. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:42 pm
The Utah Supreme Court recently issued its decision in the case of Rocky Ford Irrigation Company v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Dodge has a post that begins, “On February 8, 2024, the Seventh Circuit heard argument in Bad River Band v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
