Search for: "State v. Rivers" Results 161 - 180 of 3,999
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the briefs: Gila River Indian Community Opening Brief Tohono O’odham Nation Amicus Brief State Brief Federal Brief Lower court order: 132 DCT Order [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 1:09 pm
The court followed the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
In June, the Supreme Court agreed to review this question: Does the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes require a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the State joined the Union as directed by United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:39 pm by Amy Howe
The justices added one new case to their merits docket for the term: Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:57 am
Sometimes, accidents on bodies of water, such as the Mississippi River, are governed by a unique set of federal laws, instead of state laws. [read post]