Search for: "State v. Rodriguez"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2016, 12:14 pm
The case of Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:36 pm
Marcia Del ReyCircuit Group 30 - Incumbent Rosa Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:10 pm
”United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 6:33 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 12:34 pm
The 9th effectively overrules Estrada-Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:02 am
Supreme Court addressed this question in Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Rodriguez v Republic Services, Inc. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 1:00 pm
The decision in Dahlia v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:30 pm
Take a look at the certificate of service on page 9 of the Government's opposition to the petition for reconsideration in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 12:33 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 8:58 pm
Concerning Virginia extended traffic stops, Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:56 am
The First Department decided this issue yesterday in Rodriguez v Saal, 2007 NY Slip Op 06336. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 2:15 pm
Rodriguez, Acting Warden (Habeas Corpus; Indian Civil Rights Act) Narragansett Indian Tribe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:58 pm
(See People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 8:18 pm
Rodriguez 16-643 Issues: Whether the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 11:44 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 1:59 pm
Rodriguez. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 4:33 am
New York City Fire Department Emergency Medical Technician terminated after testing positive for cocaine NYC Fire Department v Rivera, OATH Index #3416/09OATH Administrative Law Judge Julio Rodriguez recommended termination of Carlos Rivera, a New York City Fire Department EMT.Rivera tested positive for cocaine in a random workplace drug test -- registering more than 250 times the official cut-off.The Department had previously sent him for voluntary rehabilitation three times and… [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:31 am
A few days ago, a bunch of sites posted about an interesting video of a traffic stop that is relevant to the Supreme Court’s recent cert grant in Rodriguez v. [read post]
