Search for: "State v. Roebuck" Results 1 - 20 of 244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 4:04 am by Peter J. Sluka
Services, Inc. v Jupiter Partners, L.P., 309 AD2d 288, 300 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:22 am by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court rules abortion access is a right protected by state constitution; The finding delivered a significant victory for reproductive rights advocates in the state following the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
Sears Roebuck, 421 U.S. 132, 150-53 (1975)(recognizing the deliberative process privilege, but limiting it to pre-decisional documents); EPA v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am by Robert Liles
In fact, as late as the 1890s, it was possible to buy cocaine through the Sears & Roebuck catalogue.[4] Notably, when the impact of addictive substances became apparent in the early 20th century, our government didn’t focus its efforts on prohibiting the use of opiates. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am by Eugene Volokh
In PruneYard, for instance, the Court stressed that "no specific message is dictated by the State to be displayed on appellants' property. [read post]