Search for: "State v. Rome" Results 261 - 280 of 704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2010, 5:13 pm by Colin O'Keefe
McMahon on Barger Wolen’s Litigation Management and Attorney Fee Analysis Blog The Combs v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:15 pm by Duncan Hollis
Supreme Court’s decision today in Samantar v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:12 pm by Administrator
Article 75 of the Rome Statute gave victims a right to seek reparations: Article 75 Reparations to victims 1. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
Examining Diageo Brands BV v Simiramida-04 EOOD [2015] C-681/13) James drew attention to the CJEU’s strict approach to countries refusing to enforce judgments from another Member State on the grounds of public policy. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm by Florian Mueller
Many roads lead to Rome, but if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
 Steven questioned whether there was a solution to this troublesome state of events. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:35 pm by David Friedman
David Norcross, Esq., Blank Rome William J. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 6:25 pm
See United States v. von Weizsaecker (The Ministries Case), in 14 Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, at 662 (William S. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 10:27 am by Scott Plamondon
  While it’s not clear how the Uniform Commercial Code or the Rome Statute possibly could govern the relationship between a Facebook user and the website, the Facebook terms of use agreement clearly states that “you own all of the content and information you post on Facebook . [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:18 am by Mithun Mansinghani
The state of Oklahoma, through Attorney General Mike Hunter, joined a 20-state amicus brief led by the state of Texas in support of the petitioners, a bakery corporation and its owner, in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am by Jonathan Fitchen
The majority (for the benefit of non-UK readers, when there is a majority the law is to be understood to be stated on this matter by  that majority in a manner as authoritative as if there had been unanimity across all five judges) considered that there was no choice of an applicable law pertinent to Art.3 of Rome I in the underlying contract by which Enka’s services had been engaged. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am by Marta Requejo
To reach this conclusion, the opinion walks through the history of arguments over corporate liability since WWII, ranging from Nuremberg to the considered refusal of the states-party to include corporations in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
The barbarian nations which we have subjugated know our valour, Africa and other provinces without number being once more, after so long an interval, reduced beneath the sway of Rome by victories granted by Heaven, and themselves bearing witness to our dominion. [read post]