Search for: "State v. Rome"
Results 301 - 320
of 702
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2009, 12:49 pm
Thus, the Holy See could not be sued simply for promulgating the 1962 policy in Rome. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 7:13 am
The article proceeds with an analysis of the applicability of the Rome I Convention, finding that Rome I applies to the contractual liability of an arbitrator. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 10:31 am
Hurlock The International Court of Justice: Effectively Providing a Long Overdue Remedy for Ending State-Sponsored Genocide (Bosnia-Herzegovina v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 7:05 am
Lalani HS, Kesselheim AS, Rome BN. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:10 pm
Pre-Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court has rendered a decision in the case of Prosecutor v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:02 am
In that circumstance, ruling in favour of the plaintiff, the Court of First Instance of Rome (Trib. of Rome 23 June 1984 in Foro.It 1985) acknowledged the undeniable right of the author under Article 20 of the Italian Copyright Act(integrity right) to oppose the circulation of those versions of the movie he did not directly take care of. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 1:19 pm
The Rome Statute created the ICC in 1998. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
| Feilin v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm
Since 2009, Kiko has been accusing Wycon (previously known as Wjcon) of copying its concept stores before the Courts of Rome and Milan but, on those occasions, unsuccessfully. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
In its Haeger & Schmidt ruling the court clarifies that those contracts, which exclusively state an obligation to arrange for transport cannot be considered contracts of carriage in the meaning of Art. 4 para. 4 Rome Convention or Art. 5 para. 1 Rome I Regulation. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:48 pm
Of particular interest is the AG’s reference to Regulation (EC) No. 593/2008 (Rome I Regulation) (para. 67 et seq.) which is used as an additional argument supporting her opinion: She stresses that - by interpreting the notion of “services” - also the Rome I Regulation has to be taken into consideration in order to prevent an interpretation being contrary to the aims of Rome I since Recital No. 7 of the Rome I Regulation… [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
That doctrine comes into play when: (1) the federal plaintiff lost in state court; (2) the plaintiff complains of some injury from the state court judgment; (3) the state court judgment antedated the filing of the federal case; and (4) the plaintiff is inviting the federal court to reject the state court judgment. The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Third Circuit, and that’s where we are today: Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
LUISS “Guido Carli” University of Rome. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
UK decision actually states in full [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
Finesse Wireless LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
”89 The court confirmed this understanding of the section 4(a) bailout provision by citing to the Supreme Court’s City of Rome case, in which the Court held that the city of Rome, Georgia, “was ineligible to seek bailout because the coverage formula of § 4(b) ha[d] never been applied to it. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 12:40 pm
” (Physicians for Human Rights v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:23 pm
Opinion on SGAE v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:33 pm
Never Too Late 118 [week ending on Sunday 16 October] | Rome Court of First Instance rules that copyright exceptions for news reporting and criticism/review do not apply to entertainment TV programmes | It's a gas! [read post]
